Sunday, March 6, 2016

Popular design news of the week: February 29, 2016 – March 6, 2016

http://ift.tt/1QWz9Mo

Every week users submit a lot of interesting stuff on our sister site Webdesigner News, highlighting great content from around the web that can be of interest to web designers. 

The best way to keep track of all the great stories and news being posted is simply to check out the Webdesigner News site, however, in case you missed some here’s a quick and useful compilation of the most popular designer news that we curated from the past week.

Note that this is only a very small selection of the links that were posted, so don’t miss out and subscribe to our newsletter and follow the site daily for all the news.

7 Google Changes that will Make or Break your SEO

 

Apple’s New iPhone has a Flexible Future

 

Show Me your Damn Pricing

 

Don’t Design What Users Want

 

The Designer’s Guide to Prototyping in Principle

 

A Simple Trick for Creating Color Palettes Quickly

 

Fullstack Design

 

Why Circular Profile Pictures Accentuate Faces

 

Confirmed: iPhone 7 will Be even Bigger

 

Frend – A Collection of Accessible, Modern Front-end Components

 

What’s Coming in WordPress 4.5 (Features and Screenshots)

 

Hey Designer, are You Working for the Right Company?

 

How a Designer’s 3-Year-Old Daughter is Humanizing Google

 

Foundation for Sites 6.2

 

Siri and Microsoft’s New Windows Vs Mac Campaign

 

Facebook Reactions Case Study

 

Facebook’s Product Design Director Explains One of its Biggest UX Changes in Years

 

Content ID and the Rise of the Machines

 

Medium.com Building in Monetisation

 

Designers: Robots are Coming for your Jobs

 

In 1998 Ana Voog was the Most Famous Person Online

 

Apple is Giving Non-employees Commit Access to Swift on GitHub

 

Inside Design: Capital One

 

Lessons Learned from Relaunching Our Website

 

Design Thinking Shakes up the Beige World of Enterprise Software

 

Want more? No problem! Keep track of top design news from around the web with Webdesigner News.

LAST DAY: 350+ Watercolor Design Elements & 100+ Stamp Brushes – only $17!

Source

Vía Webdesigner Depot http://ift.tt/21P5kss

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Comics of the week #329

http://ift.tt/1SpVaZk

Every week we feature a set of comics created exclusively for WDD.

The content revolves around web design, blogging and funny situations that we encounter in our daily lives as designers.

These great cartoons are created by Jerry King, an award-winning cartoonist who’s one of the most published, prolific and versatile cartoonists in the world today.

So for a few moments, take a break from your daily routine, have a laugh and enjoy these funny cartoons.

Feel free to leave your comments and suggestions below as well as any related stories of your own…

They’re good for business

In  the big picture

 

Over delivering on the home front

Can you relate to these situations? Please share your funny stories and comments below…

32 Mighty Fonts and 50+ illustrations – only $12!

Source

Vía Webdesigner Depot http://ift.tt/21MO472

Friday, March 4, 2016

Combat clutter to boost conversions

http://ift.tt/21MRNOA

When we design websites, we do so to get a message across to our audience. However, one of the biggest hurdles that we often have to overcome in order to get that message to our visitors is clutter.

When visitors come across a website that they perceive to be cluttered, some of them just up and leave; a survey from Burst Media shows that 30% of all respondents will immediately abandon a website if they feel it is too cluttered.

A website that’s cluttered makes you customers feel anxious. They have a goal to achieve but you’re making it harder for them to trust you. If your website is a mess, will working with you be the same? — Joe Ardeeser, Jordan Crown Design

But how do you know if your web site is cluttered? After all, no one designs a site with the intent of confusing or irritating their audience.

Checking for website clutter

There are several ways to tell if you built a cluttered website. User testing is always a preferred method because you get real feedback from actual people. However, they won’t always use the term “cluttered” to describe your website. They may tell you: that the site is too busy, that it is too hard to find information, that they don’t know what to click on or that there is just too much stuff.

Basically, if the user is overwhelmed and doesn’t know where to look, then your site is cluttered. The drawback to this is that setting up user testing can be expensive and time consuming. There are premium testing options available, but you will need very deep pockets.

Other tools that help you tell if your site is cluttered are the Five Second Test that presents a web page to a tester for a total of five seconds. After that, the tester can no longer see the page but they are asked questions about what they recall from the page they just saw. The goal is to present information in a way that people can remember; if your site is cluttered odds are they won’t recall the most important information you are trying to get across to them. There are free options as well as the ability to create a pro account.

For a completely free test there is the Clutter Test; using an algorithm, the test measures the amount of clutter. According to their research, anything below 50 percent clutter is good. For an idea of how sites are measured, Google earned a 16 percent while Yahoo! earned an 86 percent.

Preventing clutter

A cluttered website is usually the result of trying to give the visitor too much information on one page. As professionals either we, or the client, feel that certain things need to be highlighted. When there are too many things that fall into this category, it is easy for things to get cluttered.

Joe Ardeeser’s method of preventing a site from becoming cluttered requires proper planning and a good review. Some tips he offers are:

  • prioritize features, you can style items differently to create priority;
  • remove unneeded items;
  • create wireframes and designs that are intentional;
  • hide deeper, less important items, but have strong, clear navigation so that these items are “discover-able”.

When you have too much “important” information on a single page, everything is fighting for the attention of the visitor and they are often distracted from the real purpose. Art Webb said it best when he pointed out the obvious:

If you make everything bold, nothing is bold.

Reduce the clutter

Whether you have determined that a site you built suffers from too much clutter, or you are redesigning someone else’s cluttered site you have to take a strategic approach to cleaning things up.

The first step to take is to prioritize what is important. There are some who believe that every page should be accessible from every other page—this can be achieved with well organized menus and site maps; everything doesn’t have to be crammed on to one page. Set a goal for each page and only include information that helps achieve that goal.

Once each page has it priority, start to minimize. Cut out everything that isn’t necessary to help achieve the goal of that page. Understand the less is more concept of minimalist design and really put that into practice.

After you have pruned everything that you feel is unnecessary, run your tests again. If things are still coming up as cluttered, you need to go back to square one. This time take an honest look at what you can remove without hurting the purpose of the website. If you are happy with the feedback you receive then great, but make sure that you don’t let things get cluttered as time goes on.

Clutter happens, and we know that clutter hurts. It hurts a website’s traffic, it hurts its reputation and it hurts important metrics like conversion rates. When we are designing websites we have to keep in mind that they are not a collage of content but rather a tool to communicate. They need to make their message clear to any visitor the moment they land on the site. Users are only willing to spend so much of their attention on a website, make sure that you are doing what you can to capture that attention and point them in the right direction.

 

Featured image uses iMac image and UI image via Shutterstock.

450+ Pro Lightroom Presets Bundle – only $14!

Source

Vía Webdesigner Depot http://ift.tt/1QvHsTA

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Sketch 3.6 finally introduces functional typography

http://ift.tt/1QuxLog

Mac-based typophiles rejoice! Bohemian Coding have smiled on you in the form of a new Sketch update. Where before there were inconsistent baselines and sadness, there shall now be great-looking text, and joy.

Now you can really get some mileage out of your Helvet… Oh, we’re not doing that anymore? Okay.

The point is that Sketch has gotten a pretty extensive set of improvements to the way it handles text in general. Since Sketch is about designing for the Web, and the Web is mostly text, this is a pretty vital thing to get right.

It’s all about the baseline

According to the guys at Sketch, the biggest improvement they made had to do with making text baselines behave the way users expect. To accomplish this, they had to delve into the way fonts are constructed and displayed in the first place.

In the fonts themselves, they had to deal with ligatures, and swashes. Then there are diacritical marks: the carons, cedillas, accent marks, and more. Basically, measuring the space between lines isn’t as simple as looking at the capital letters and saying, “Yeah, but that’s all we need, right?”

Then there’s the fact that different fonts handle all of those different things… well… differently. And sometimes, you want to use more than one font in a paragraph; at least, you want to be able to, even if you don’t actually want to do it.

Turns out that Apple’s text system doesn’t do uniform baselines on its own. Even if you set a specific line-height, the actual line-height gets calculated differently based on every font. When mixing and matching fonts, that can go wrong.

The people at Sketch have taken each and every one of these factors into consideration in their new update to make typographical baselines work right.

Lastly:

when changing fonts for text layers, we’ve gone to some lengths to preserve the position of the first baseline, so your text layers will no longer jump around vertically when changing between fonts.

Though the type system of Sketch has been improved, the devs have asked us to remember that they can’t replicate the way type looks on every browser or operating system. They’re all different, so that’s just never going to happen. Their focus has mainly been on making making their software more pleasant and useful.

This is reportedly only the first of several type improvements this year, let’s hope they’re all as useful.

LAST DAY: Designer’s Vintage Studio – Over 200+ Retro Resources – only $27!

Source

Vía Webdesigner Depot http://ift.tt/1QvBH4O

Google Photos releases a major update

http://ift.tt/1QtTA7u

Google Photos, Google’s picture and video-sharing and storage service, has been upgraded to give users a bunch of new features aimed at improving ease of use. The changes affect both the desktop-web version and Android.

First up is what’s happening on desktop. Users who’ve been upset by Google Photos’ decision to abandon the Snapseed-based picture-editing tool of Google+ when Photos broke away from the faltering Google+ now have a reason to rejoice: the company has redesigned Photos’ editing tool, offering users more flexibility.

Previously, Google+ users had a fair answer to Adobe’s Photoshop when it came to the editing prowess of Google+’s Snapseed-based tool. While Snapseed is still around as an Android app, web users of Photos can now edit in a more practical way.

You’re now able to move between different images that you’re editing, and you won’t lose work completed. Photos will just save the changes, and, when you’ve finished making edits, you can click on either “Done” or “Revert to Original,” should you choose not to keep the changes.

A new aspect ratio selector brings more flexibility into the mix as well. It allows users to crop to four, distinct sizes: square, original size, 4:3 and 16:9.

Before these updates, Photos had some picture-editing options, but they were limited. For instance, you were able to manually change brightness and color and apply a few predefined filters. Images could be cropped, rotated vertically or horizontally, angled up to 45 degrees to the left or right. All of your changes could then be applied and permanently saved or discarded by returning the image to its original condition.

The company also announced on the same day design changes to its Android app. The biggest addition is the presence of a new bottom bar that makes switching between features like Assistant, new Albums and Photos a cinch. The end result: You can use more of your time to look at pictures instead of flipping between these menus. Even tapping your selections has been made more efficient due to the addition of bigger buttons at the top of the screen in Assistant.

Albums used to be known as Collections, a change made to reflect user feedback. Albums comes with a scrolling carousel on top that provides instant access to shared places, people, albums, device folders, movies, collages and animations. The company promises that these changes will be made available on iOS soon.

Earlier, these features were stashed off to the side in a sidebar, but the new interface means greater accessibility, as simply getting them right from the footer menu will be a boon to app navigation.

Initially, Google built Photos into the Google+ social network, but its failure to ever really find traction and begin competing with a powerhouse like Facebook caused the company to focus instead on Photos, leading it to be offered as a standalone service. With these new features, the company is certainly reinforcing its commitment to its picture and video-sharing and storage service.

LAST DAY: Designer’s Vintage Studio – Over 200+ Retro Resources – only $27!

Source

Vía Webdesigner Depot http://ift.tt/1Y5CM8y

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Classic landing page mistakes you’re probably still making

http://ift.tt/1Lxy01B

One of the biggest clashes in design has been the question of whether to strip down your landing page to the point where it’s so minimal that it has no navigation at all. Proponents argue that the only thing on a landing page should be the call to action button, so as to eliminate all distractions and increase conversions; opponents will say that’s too extreme. So how do designers know what the best course of action is when it comes to landing page design?

In general, your landing page should absolutely be as minimal as you can make it because distractions (ie. anything that takes users and leads away from your page goal) will cost your site money.

Remove navigation

One of the reasons this discussion still exists today is the fact that many landing pages still have navigation bars, sad to say. Just 16% of all landing pages are free of navigation, which is alarming because of all the lost conversion opportunities. Designers who include navigation on their landing pages aren’t looking out for the best interests of their clients.

If you happen to have a client who insists on navigation on the site’s landing page, it’s your job as the designer to educate him. Point him to numerous studies like this one, backed by hard data, that show that taking navigation away from a landing page increases conversion rates. This is true for any type of content that the page is offering, from free trials and demos to ebook templates and content-creation kits.

Sure, your client may push back because of various reasons such as disbelieving the data, branding (company logo on the navigation menu), or refusing to prioritize the importance of removing the navigation on a landing page. In all these situations, gently persuade your client by consistently impressing him with case study after case study:

The Light Phone site gives you two simple options: pre-order, or scroll for more information.

Drop stock images

With the navigation menu gone, the next thing on your list to ax is stock images. These dreaded and generic nightmares that celebrate insincerity will hurt your clients’ conversion rates, too. Stock images fail to inspire trust on a landing page because it’s almost like a business concealing who’s behind it.

So on your landing page, be sure to use real images of the people behind the product or service, as nothing inspires conversions like credibility.

Further, be sure to place images on top of the landing page headline. This is highly important, as marketing guru David Ogilvy himself found when he conducted research, headlines underneath images are read by 10% more viewers. Of course, when more people read your page’s headline, more continue reading down the page.

Now that you have images under control, you have to make your page’s flow work its way toward the all-important call to action button.

Irving Farm’s site uses real photographs to pack the site with the company’s brand personality.

Focus on calls to action

One of the hardest things to possibly design on a landing page is the call to action button. It requires a lot of thought and consideration because it is the star of your page, the whole reason it exists. If your page flow and information architecture make your offer persuasive and clear, then visitors should have no problem clicking on the button.

There are a couple of things to get right.

First, there’s the color: it should feature good color contrast so that your visitors can easily find and click it.

Then, there’s the size: it has to be big enough to be easily read.

You can also add a directional cue next to the button to make it all the harder to miss.

Don’t neglect the button copy. It should be persuasive and use a sense of urgency. This means using action-based words like “hurry,” which is also one of the most persuasive words in the English language, and “now,” which also speaks of urgency.

Google’s Jigsaw delivers a very clear call to action.

Downplay other links

We spoke of eliminating the navigation menu from the very beginning of this article, yet the goal of a high-converting and successful, landing-page design should involve getting rid of as many links as possible. When you remove the navigation, there may still be other links on the page that you need to deal with to make the page as much of a single-action environment as possible and support your conversion funnel.

Another clever tactic is to make any necessary links as unnoticeable as possible. After all, the fewer links on the page, the fewer elements will compete for your clients’ leads’ attention on the page. And when there are fewer distractions, there are greater chances for conversions.

Charles Haggas’ site prompts you to hire him; nothing else on the site matters as much.

Minimalism and conversion rates

Designers should always keep in mind that they’re designing for consumer psychology when they’re designing for landing pages. Many studies have been done that prove how consumers are simply overwhelmed and experience decision-making problems when faced with too many choices. The notorious jam experiment of a few years ago springs to mind; in it, people bought less jam from a table with more jam choices than the table with fewer choices.

Thus is the case with landing pages as well. When your clients’ leads arrive on your landing page and are greeted with way too many links and a navigation menu, they’re likely to go elsewhere and fail to complete the conversion. Combine that with horrible stock images and poorly designed call to action buttons, and you’ve designed a low-converting disaster for your client.

That’s why you have to think minimalism when designing your landing page. From the initial conception to the wireframe to the final testing, the landing page you design must have few choices so to only emphasize to visitors and leads the one and only goal of the entire page: to convert by clicking on the product or service offered. And that’s it!

Fluid Mask 3 – Professional Image Masking Tool – only $49!

Source

Vía Webdesigner Depot http://ift.tt/1L66M2b

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

How to avoid common UX traps

http://ift.tt/1OLEnsI

How many times have you been on a website, only to leave frustrated and annoyed at the experience you received during your visit? Believe it or not, this is a fairly common occurrence, especially when websites ignore good UX practices.

If you’re involved in any aspect of a website build, it’s imperative that you avoid common UX problems, if you want to stay in your users’ good books. Let’s take a look at the 4 most common UX traps that designers fall into, and how to avoid them…

Forms

Forms are necessary for gathering information about users, clients, and customers. You can’t get around using them, but they shouldn’t be unbearable to fill out. Forms should have very few questions as to what information a website is looking for. One of the biggest problems of online forms is when there are no instructions.

Formatting

When asking someone for specific information, emphasize what it is you are looking for. If you require a special format for something, such as a date, time, or any other formatted information, it should come with an example. Nothing is more annoying than filling out a form, only to receive an error message when you’re finished.

Placeholder text

It’s nice when a designer goes a little above and beyond and gives you a hint at the type of information they are looking for, by providing placeholder text in the form field. While this is extremely convenient, there have been several times when I have encountered placeholder text that doesn’t go away when you start typing in the form field. This is a huge point of frustration for any user, because they have to stop typing, select everything, and delete it, starting all over again. They also might select the unnecessary type and delete that, causing an interruption in their thought process while filling out the form. Whenever using placeholder text to hint at the type of information you are looking for, make sure it goes away when someone selects that input field.

Error messages

There’s nothing more frustrating than trying to do something on a website, only to receive an error message, without enough information, or any at all. If a website user encounters an error, there should be an explanation of what is incorrect and how to fix it. For example, if you log into a site with a username and password, if you make a mistake with one, you should be told which. With so many logins to websites out there, it’s easy to accumulate multiple variations of usernames and passwords. There are some cases when I have had to modify my usual username and password combination, because it didn’t meet the requirements of a website’s registration, such as 2 capital letters, or a number, letter, and punctuation or symbol.

Other examples would include: if passwords don’t match, during the registration process, show an error message before submitting. Another example might be if a username is already taken, show that before someone submits their registration.

No one likes having to redo something, especially after receiving poor instructions. You’ll have a lot higher engagement if you make it easy for users to provide you with the correct information the first time.

Large, fixed navigational headers

I’m not sure how this became popular, but I’ve seen it a lot, on many sites around the web.  The issue with such a large header and all of those navigational elements is when you scroll down the page, it blocks a lot of content. This is especially frustrating when there are parts you need to get to, or when the content would otherwise fill the height of the browser, but part of it is concealed by navigation.

Especially On Mobile

What’s even worse is that sometimes, when a site is brought down to mobile size, the large header is still kept in place. This is a bad experience all around, because space is already limited on smartphone screens. It doesn’t need to be taken up by a nav menu that could otherwise be hidden. If there are certain nav elements that need to stay visible, turn those into small icons, or place them somewhere out of the way.

Low contrast

My eyes are good, but I am not a fan of trying to visually discern charcoal text or icons on a black background. No one should have to go through that. Contrast is key, especially in web design.

Text

Any text should be easily read, with enough weight to make it easy to read. 100 weight fonts have virtually no place on the web (except in a few special cases). Using a super thin font on a smartphone is simply asking for trouble. There has to be enough visual contrast there for your eyes to make out the letterforms.

Color

For all elements of a website, there should be plenty of easily discernable contrast between colors. Any and all text should have a high rate of contrast from its background. That goes for any links, navigational elements or icons, too. It shouldn’t be difficult to find what you are looking for.

Calls to actions

Just like other links and navigational elements, your call to action elements should display a high level of contrast. If you want a website visitor to take action, make it prominent, easy to read, and load and clear. Far too many times you’ll see a call to action with a button that doesn’t stand out enough from the background. Sometimes, it’s not a button at all, and it’s just a simple text link surrounded by white space.

Touch targets on mobile

I see this on a lot of mobile sites and it is one of the most frustrating elements to deal with. If you have a button or a link to click, give it enough space so that users don’t accidentally hit the wrong thing. On a smartphone, make sure that any buttons or links are far enough away from the edge or the corner of their screen, so they can be easily tapped.

Many times, a button placed too close to any of the 4 corners of a screen is too difficult to tap precisely. If you have larger fingers, the smartphone may not register your action at all.  This causes the user to have to tap several times to get the feature to work. Space for these elements is extremely important.

Conclusion

These common UX problems can be easily avoided with a little extra work and forethought. If you want your website visitors to use and enjoy your site, it is important to make the process easy and fluid. Avoiding having your users repeat actions and processes over again cuts down on frustration and provides the user experience everyone expects from a well-designed site.

 

Featured image, UX design image via Shutterstock.

HUMONGOUS Font Bundle (30 Fonts with Extended License) – only 29!

Source

Vía Webdesigner Depot http://ift.tt/1ng8Fh5